|
Solving America’s Greatest Conflict is now available for purchase on Kindle for $4.99 or paperback for $9.99!
|
|
From Reviewer, Dr. Jay Lehr, Science Director, The Heartland Institute believes that was this simple pamphlet to be read by the average freedom long, apolitical American, the creeping collectivism that has undermined so much of what our founding Fathers intended in the American Constitution could begin to be overturned. Over more than a century the public has been brainwashed into believing that some nebulous concept of public good takes precedence over the individual rights and freedoms that differentiated our nation from all others on earth. The individual has been cowed into believing that his or her rights are pursued only at the expense of that “public good.” This allowed our citizens to be led into a socialist society not of his or her making or desire. It has been a clever and underhanded subterfuge that has come close to bringing down the entire nation. Fortunately, Mike Gemmell has the understanding and presence to address this issue head on in a manner that will be clear to any thinking American. His work is a “tour de force.” I lecture to thousands of men and women across America every year. I would love the opportunity to put this important message into all of their hands. |
|
|
Review: The Art of Reasoning: An Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking – Part 4
By Tasha Stacey |
|
The two most positive thinkers I have known are Dr. Jay Lehr, Science Director at the Heartland Institute and my late friend E.G. (Ernie) Ross. I look forward to telling readers about the remarkable Dr. Lehr in a future issue, but today is for Ernie Ross an economist, journalist, defense expert, and positive thinker extraordinaire. During Ernie’s heyday in the 1980s and 1990s, much of the pro-liberty literature was rather dark and dour. However, being as independent as he was he blazed his own trail and instead chose to emphasize the positive. Taped to his computer terminal as a daily reminder was his mantra: What about the positive? So it is in Ernie’s memory I would like to introduce readers to someone who is carrying on that positive-thinking legacy: Alex Epstein and his relentlessly positive book:The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels, 2014.
Positive thinking/vision is particularly important for those who wish to initiate the cultural reforms needed in our world. Changing the status quo is always a challenging proposition because: (1) that status quo typically likes things the way they are and resists change (2) The status quo has often framed the issues in such a way as to shift public opinion toward the continuation of things as they are, and (3) Effective leadership to groups attempting to go against the grain of the status quo is virtually impossible without a positive vision being provided. Such is the case with fossil fuels which have been viewed since the advent of the environmental movement in the early 1960s as, at best, a necessary evil and at worst evil incarnate. And then along came Alex Epstein with his views on human flourishing as expressed in The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels. . .
Epstein no doubt knew a great deal about the nature of the status quo in the realm of energy and environmentalism when he launched his enterprise, Center for Industrial Progress. In 2012 as a relative unknown he challenged to a debate the man generally considered the most prominent environmentalist of our day: Bill McKibben. Procuring McKibben’s appearance to debate the issue of fossil fuels use in public cost Epstein $10,000, a considerable sum especially at a crucial time in the launching of Center for Industrial Progress.
Mckibben’s view of fossil fuels is expressed in his book The End of Nature:
“Our goal should be a “humble world” one where we have less impact on our environment and “Human happiness would be of secondary importance.”
Epstein’s view that “human flourishing” should be the standard of value successfully carried the day in their debate and is amply defended in his book with startling facts such as:
· As fossil fuel use increased from 1980 to 2012, levels from the six major air pollutants measured by the EPA to develop air quality standards all went down (p. 19)
· As fossil fuel use has increased in developing countries such as China and India, life expectancy has also dramatically increased (p. 14)
· As fossil fuel use has increased in those same countries, economic well being as measured by GDP hasincreased accordingly (p. 14)
· As CO2 emissions have rapidly escalated since 1900, climate-related deaths have gone down dramatically (p. 24).
As Epstein explains, the so-called pundits have for decades been spectacularly wrong in their dire predictions because they invariably focus on the risks of technology but never thebenefits. This deeply flawed worldview is a direct result of the environmental ideology promoted by Rachel Carson in Silent Spring the bestselling work that effectively launched the environmental movement in the U.S. and around the world.
The importance of “human flourishing” and its use in energy and environmental issues cannot be overstated. I consider it to be a 21st century update of the Enlightenment spirit of unbounded optimism that America was founded upon. It is no accident that the world’s first republic came to be created in the country where the spirit of the Enlightenment had penetrated most deeply. Unfortunately, that spirit of boundless optimism emanating from a culture-wide respect for the human faculty of reason has been seriously damaged in the intervening years from America’s birth to the present day. By his demonstration of the validity of the principle of human flourishing in energy and environmental issues, Epstein has taken a giant step toward restoring the Enlightenment spirit that the U.S. rests upon. Those who care about the future of America and understand the relationship of the principle of human flourishing to that futureneed to read this book.
Note: Epstein’s book is written for the general reader and requires no specialized knowledge to read. For more information on the Enlightenment era and why it serves as the foundation for the republic in America, please see ROAR’s lead essay: “The Defining Spirit of America.”
|
|
Summary
In ROAR’s continuing attempt to emphasize education reform, we’ve seen further examples of how Tasha Stacey envisions The Art of Reasoning can supplement a conventional educational curriculum and also be used to help prevent the further indoctrination of students in our public education system. We hope that readers of our review of The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels and Alex Epstein’s views on human flourishing will be excited by his relentlessly positive perspective and help spread the word about this marvelous work. We also hope readers understand the importance of leadership archetypes such as the one presented in our review of the Jerry Bruckheimer King Arthur movie especially for inspiring up and coming leaders in America. |
|
|
|
Leave a Reply