A Time for Truth Regarding the COVID-19 Pandemic
In 2010 my colleague, Dr. Jay Lehr and I co-authored “Saving Science after Climate Gate: Recovering from the Loss of Scientific Credibility.” In that paper we stated in our introductory remarks:
“The Climategate scandal has brought to light glaring problems in publicly funded science including occurrences of political correctness, science by consensus, and alarmist science…”
What follows in regard to the COVID-19 pandemic are the same problems with publicly funded science and have led to a complete meltdown in the area of public health with panicked alarmism leading to unnecessary and destructive lockdowns, fabricating of both cases AND deaths to make the outbreak appear much worse than it actually is, and censorship of dissenters such as Dr. Knut Wittkowski (“Youtube censors epidemiologist Knut Wittkowski for opposing lockdown” The banned video can be viewed here. ). Youtube CEO Susan Wojcicki remarked on the banned video:
“Anything that goes against [World Health Organization] recommendations would be a violation of our policy and so removal is another really important part of our policy”
Twitter representatives acted similarly in removing tweets by Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro:
“We have broadened our definition of harm to address content that goes directly against guidance from authoritative sources of global and local public health information,”
Facebook also conceded it had been working with state governments in California, New Jersey and Nebraska to remove pages for anti-quarantine events.
In addition, dissenting scientists such as Dr. Simone Gold, and Dr. Scott Jensen, have had their careers threatened due to their opposition to the COVID narrative put forth by public health authorities.
The reigning authorities who have done everything possible to paint a much bleaker picture than has been warranted include Dr. Anthony Fauci head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectitious Diseases (NIAID), the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Association (FDA), the World Health Organization (WHO), state public health officials, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and large Pharmaceutical companies commonly known as “Big Pharma.”
In a highly insightful interview, another dissenter, Dr. V.A. Shiva and Senate candidate in Massachusetts points out the endgame that the reigning authorities are using the pandemic for is to promote universal mandatory vaccinations as a means to extend authoritarian control of public health authorities into virtually every aspect of our lives. Toward that end, public authorities with the help of the media have wrongfully demonized hydoroxychoroquine as a treatment for COVID-19 to the point of falsifying data in the Lancet one of the world’s leading medical journals (“The Lancet Retracts Hydroxychloroquine Study”), and ignoring published studies on the safety and effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine such as the study at the Henry Ford Health Center that showed its effectiveness in the treatment of 2,541 patients. The end game of Anthony Fauci and the public health community is to promote the idea that only universal mandatory vaccination can end the pandemic. And in fact as Dr. Shiva points out mandatory vaccinations are already occurring in Denmark where authorities can not only test but are allowed to forcibly vaccinate people using police force.
The American people and people around the world must wake up to the gigantic fraud that is being perpetrated against us. The following essay will identify the mechanism that allowed it to occur as well as recommending remedial measures such as insisting on complete openness and transparency on the part of public health authorities, ending the practice of using non-peer reviewed papers in public policy, and more.
The Origin of the Problem
Some months ago in an essay on climate change (“Climate Change and the Larger Cultural Picture Round II”) I mentioned the worldwide effort by a number of groups with various ideologies working to de-stabilize the current world order that had one thing in common:
subjugating the rights and happiness of individuals to some other authority either secular or religious.
This was before the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns had taken place. At that time I was referring to the actions of the Progressive liberals in power and their desperation at attempting to remove President Trump from office. The Mueller investigation and the impeachment proceedings that followed it had fallen flat as a pancake. The corruption in Big Tech in supporting the Progressive liberal agenda had also been exposed by organizations such as Project Veritas and Judicial Watch. In addition, violence had already started, e.g., Antifa on college campuses and their attempts to suppress Conservative speakers were reminiscent of Nazi brown shirts of the 1930s.
But then the pandemic hit and, unfortunately, President Trump listened to the officials of the badly corrupted WHO as well as relying on the advice of “Deep Staters” such as Anthony Fauci and the CDC for far too long. That error led to his sanctioning of lockdowns on the basis of an unverified, non-peer reviewed model of Neil Ferguson that has all but wrecked the world’s economy.
Progressive liberals in congress made no doubt of how they expected to exploit the COVID-19 pandemic:
- “The coronavirus crisis is an opportunity to advance a more progressive agenda.” – Gavin Newsome, Governor of California
- “Coronavirus an Opportunity to Fundamentally Transform America”– Joe Biden, Democratic candidate for president
To understand how the “deep state” and corrupted public health agencies evolved we have to take a step back and look at the events occurring in the early to mid-20th century that gave rise to the corrupted agencies we have today.
Science Enters the Public Realm
Although the United States was founded upon the principle of individual rights, philosophic changes in our culture over a 150 year period had largely eroded our individual rights foundation so that the Founding Fathers views on the sovereignty of the individual as expressed by Thomas Jefferson during America’s founding days:
“. . . eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man”
had largely yielded to an opposing sentiment by the mid-20th century :
“We are turning away from the entrusting of crucial decisions . . . to individuals who are motivated by private interests.” – Rex Tugwell
That sentiment helped create the perception that the funding of scientific research belonged in the public realm. In 1950 led by the efforts of Vannevar Bush public funding of scientific research including medical research began in the United States through the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institute of Health (NIH). And that is when the trouble started…
Bush, unfortunately, did not recognize the essential difference between the government funding of scientific research during the wartime conditions of WW II vs. the funding of research during peacetime. The public funding of scientific research during wartime was focused on preserving American lives, and the rights to live those lives, a universal human need. This need was a principle that could be converted to a mission-oriented action plan. Because its mission was so “reality-based”, costs vs. benefits and other objective means of measuring its success could be properly applied.
However, public funding of science in peacetime is an entirely different matter. There are no universal needs of the entire public other than the need for rights. Some segments of the public might want one kind of research vs. another, or perhaps wish to fund other activities entirely. Individuals acting in a marketplace are able to assess their own costs vs. benefits and act accordingly. But when we invoke the “public interest” (a.k.a. the “general welfare,” “common good,” “greater good,” etc.) we are referring to people in general but no one in particular. And without people in particular using their own personal values to guide their actions objectivity in the assessment of costs vs. benefits is impossible.
Inevitably the following four steps occur:
- Public funding of an issue e.g., scientific research begins
- Defining what the “public interest” is concerning scientific research proves impossible leading to vague and/or arbitrary definitions.
- Limits on the number of people/viewpoints are used to manipulate the decision-making process and influence peddling becomes the order of the day..
- The situation degenerates with exploding costs and final entrenchment of an established viewpoint or paradigm.
This process occurred in environmental research as Dr. Lehr and I discussed in “Saving Science after Climate Gate: Recovering from the Loss of Scientific Credibility” It entrenched an anti-industrial perspective regarding manmade chemicals in publicly funded scientific research institutions leading to the banning of DDT one of the safest and beneficial chemicals ever created. It also entrenched the paradigm of human-induced climate change. The theory of human-induced climate change endures today despite two massive worldwide scandals regarding the suppression of scientific data and other dishonest practices including the demonization of scientists skeptical of the theory. It is one of the primary components of the “Green New Deal” being pushed by leading democrats such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
The same process that corrupted the field of environmental science research has also occurred in the medical research field and has resulted in the entrenchment of a pharmaceutical approach to medicine and the overemphasis of vaccines in medicine in general and the treatment of COVID-19 in particular.
The Rise of Big Pharma and the Role of Vaccines in Public Health
With the funding of medical research beginning in 1950, alliances were built between pharmaceutical companies, academic physicians, and organized medicine to produce drugs such as antibiotics, cortisone and tranquilizers. By 1956 the National Institute of Health (NIH) funding was nearly $100 million. Since the public as a whole did not have a preference as to where the money should go, the most effective influence peddler made that decision, i.e., pharmaceutical companies.
With the 1961 Vaccination Act nationwide widespread child immunization began for the purpose of preventing five diseases: diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, and smallpox, and as of 2015 to attend public school, children were required to receive at least 56 doses of 14 vaccines by the age of 18.
One of the key factors in entrenching the pharmaceutical approach to medicine was enacted in 1964 with the formation of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). The committee was formed with representatives of the CDC and the pharmaceutical industry. Members of the ACIP are forbidden to publicly discuss what occurs during closed portions of meetings. The scientific, medical, and political bases for the vaccine recommendations are not revealed to the public even though the public is supplying the funding for the vaccine programs that are subsequently enacted.
Prior to the creation of the ACIP, public health authorities required vaccinations of individuals in regard to infectious disease only in the case of a clear and present danger to public health, such as smallpox. In recent decades, however, Dr. Jane Orient has pointed out that recommendations of the ACIP have frequently become mandatory through the actions of state legislatures or state health departments. (“Mandating Vaccines: Government Practicing Medicine Without a License?” ) This has been done even though more than 25,000 reports of adverse reactions from the hepatitis B vaccine— including 440 deaths— have been reported. In addition, reports of childhood asthma have nearly doubled since the introduction of mandatory vaccines.
After numerous injuries were reported from the 1976- swine flu vaccine, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act” in 1986 was enacted that established a vaccine court that effectively shielded manufacturers of vaccines from liability.
Medical students have testified before Congress about being told not to report suspected adverse events from vaccines. Also, doctors’ vaccination rates are monitored by government authorities and they are pressured to vaccinate in spite of possible risks (“Official Vaccine Policy Flawed.”). In addition, there have been no controlled studies to evaluate the Hepatitis B vaccine’s long-term safety, and little is known about the effect of vaccines on a newborn baby’s immune system. Efforts to obtain research grants to study the effects have been repeatedly turned down. (“Whatever Happened to Informed Medical Choice?”)
The Real History Concerning Childhood Diseases and Vaccines
Although medical authorities such as the American Medical Association, public health agencies, and the pharmaceutical industry have promoted the perception that the 20th century decline in childhood mortality from infectious disease was primarily due to the use of vaccines, a closer look at the decline tells a different story. As Dr. Edward Kass and John and Sonja McKinlay pointed out in the 1970s, the steep decline in the mortality rate from measles, pertussis (whooping cough), and diphtheria occurred almost entirely before the use of vaccines became widespread and was made possible by improved nutrition, hygiene, and sanitation. (“The Impact of Vaccines on Mortality Decline Since 1900 – According to Published Science”)
In addition, a study of the Diptheria Tuberculosis Pertussis (DTP) vaccine headed by Dr. Peter Aaby found that the data for African children who had been vaccinated with the DTP vaccine:
“was associated with 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated. No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP. . . DTP is the most widely used vaccine. . . . All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus, or pertussis. Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease, it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections.”
A shocking case of data falsification came to light in In August of 2014, Dr. Brian Hooker published an article “Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination timing and autism among young African American boys: a reanalysis of CDC data.” The article was a re-analysis of a CDC paper in 2004 by DeStefano, et al. One of the original authors of the 2004 paper, Dr. William Thompson, admitted to Hooker that he and his colleagues omitted statistically significant data on the vaccine autism link:
“Oh my God, I did not believe that we did what we did, but we did. It’s all there… This is the lowest point in my career, that I went along with that paper. I have great shame now when I meet families of kids with autism, because I have been part of the problem. We’ve missed ten years of research because the CDC is so paralyzed right now by anything related to autism. They’re not doing what they should be doing because they’re afraid to look for things that might be associated.”
And in May 2020 an additional scandal involving vaccines and the CDC came to light when the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) reported the results from its lawsuit against the CDC to obtain scientific documentation for the agency’s claim that “vaccines do not cause autism.” After initially stonewalling, the CDC finally produced 20 studies – 18 of which were irrelevant to ICAN’s public records request and two studies that did suggest vaccines may cause autism. (“CDC: Centers for Damaged Credibility”)
The beginning of grant funding in the public health field has entrenched the paradigm that the application of vaccines in childhood diseases is beyond challenge. This has been enforced by the manipulation of grant funding programs. The CDC has doled out hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to reward state health departments for promoting mass vaccinations and has the power to withhold monetary grants if state health officials don’t show proof of designated vaccination rates. States receive up to $100 per child who is fully vaccinated with all federally recommended vaccines, including hepatitis B. In addition , the use of closed door meetings concerning the vaccine approval process and outright fraud in the submission of data for publication have cast further doubt on the honesty of the CDC and the public health community.
The Gates Foundation, Anthony Fauci, and the WHO
The Gates Foundation, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and the World Health Organization (WHO) have had close ties for over 20 years. The Gates Foundation is the second biggest contributer to the WHO giving over $220 million per year. All of them work closely with the pharmaceutical industry, and they all push the pro-vaccine narrative even in the face of serious injuries and deaths that have resulted from vaccines.
Before Anthony Fauci’s current work on COVID-19, there was his work involving AIDS research at NIAID. In 1984, Robert Gallo a researcher under Fauci’s supervision announced that HIV was the AIDS virus prior to the publication of any scientific evidence and without peer review. Gallo made millions on his patented blood test for HIV despite giving numerous false positives. Today with more than thirty years of funded research and billions of dollars, no effective vaccine for HIV/AIDS exists. (“What you don’t know about Dr. Tony Fauci”)
Fauci has referred to New York’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic: “They did it correctly.” Correctly according to Fauci meant sending thousands of recovering coronavirus patients into nursing homes in settings which produced a contagion effect that has been likened to “fire through dry grass.” That action cost 6,000 New Yorkers their lives.
Fauci has also opposed the use of Hydroxychloroquine even though he endorsed the use of the drug in 2005. Instead he touts the very expensive drug Remdesivir produced by Gilead Sciences, a company he has close ties to and is connected through UNITAID , a drug purchasing group with ties to the WHO, and the Gates Foundation. And although hundreds of doctors have come out against Fauci’s proposals for lockdowns of schools, gyms, bars, and restaurants, the mainstream media has effectively censored them.(“MEDIA BLACKOUT: Thousands of Doctors and Scientists Have Come Out Against Fauci’s Lockdowns Including a Nobel Prize-Winning Biophysicist”)
The Gates Foundation
In two investigative reports, “Coronavirus & WHO – How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health” and “Covid-19 -Making Markets for Vaccines -Bill Gates’ Plan to Vaccinate the World” The Corbett Report presents the process that transformed Bill Gates from a software entrepreneur in the late 1990s to an immensely powerful public health oligarch who by using the mechanism of public-private partnerships has managed to promote vaccines as the answer to virtually all public health problems through Gates Foundation partnerships with the WHO, pharmaceutical companies, and public health organizations around the world.
In 2007 the Center for Global Development initiated a project to “develop a practical approach to the vaccine challenge” and concluded that a method to incentivize companies to develop and manufacture vaccines was to have governments promise to buy vaccines in advance. The organization’s report was titled “Making Markets for Vaccines.”
The first commitment in advance was made in 2007 with a $1.5 billion promise, from the Gates Foundation in conjunction with other members of Gavi an open partnership between: the WHO, Gates Foundation, and the world bank and vaccine manufacturers. The stated goal of the organization was:
“Introducing new vaccines into the routine schedules of national immunization programms and to engage in market shaping efforts to ensure healthy markets for vaccines and other immunization products.”
As part of its vaccines programs in third world countries, Gates used the $450 million grant to the Indian government and took over control of India’s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI) to initiate a polio vaccine program to Indian children. The program mandated up to 50 doses of polio vaccines through overlapping immunization programs to children before the age of five. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children between 2000 and 2017.
According to the investigation that followed, the program:
“violated the human rights of the study participants with gross violations of consent and failed to report adverse events experienced by the vaccine recipients.”
An investigation by the Indian parliament concluded that The Gates-funded Program for Appropriate Technology and Health (PATH), had been involved in a scheme to ensure vaccine markets for Glaxco Smith Kline and Merck the manufacturers of Gardasil and cervarix vaccines that were donated for the trial. According to Parliament of India report # 72:
“Had PATH been successful in getting the HPV vaccine included in the universal immunization program of the concerned countries, this would have generated windfall profits for the manufacturers by way of automatic sale, year after year, without any promotional or marketing expenses. It is well known that once introduced into the immunization program, it becomes politically impossible to stop any vaccination.”
In 2017, the Indian government greatly reduced the Gates’ vaccine program and asked Gates and his vaccine program to leave India. Following the reduction of the Gates vaccine regimen, NPAFP rates significantly decreased.
In addition to the rights violations in India, vaccines developed by of the Gates foundation in a phase 3 trial of Glaxo Smith Kline’s experimental malaria vaccine killed 151 African infants and caused serious adverse effects, including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions, to 1,048 of the 5,949 children. During the Gates MenAfriVac campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates Foundation operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. This resulted in 50 out of 500 children receiving the vaccine in the village of Gouro being paralyzed. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.” Nelson Mandela’s former senior economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless and immoral.” (“Gates’Globalist Vaccine Agenda: A Win-Win for Pharma and Mandatory Vaccination”)
The World Health Organization
In the documentary film “Trust Who” Lilian Franck brings to light the influence peddling that has corrupted the direction of the WHO programs. Following financial crises in the 1990s countries froze their contributions to the WHO and industry and non-governmental organizations such as the Gates Foundation contributed up to 40% of the WHO budget. Bill Gates was none too shy about declaring what this meant in a WHO meeting:
“Our priorities are your priorities.”
Unfortunately, Gates is either unaware or interested in the fact that improved nutrition, hygiene, and sanitation rather than vaccines have been the primary reasons that mortality rates of children have dropped significantly during the 20th century. (“The Impact of Vaccines on Mortality Decline Since 1900 – According to Published Science”). Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of steering WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases: clean water and sanitation, hygiene, nutrition, and economic development. The Gates Foundation spends only $650 million of its $5 billion dollar budget on these areas. In addition, the Gates Foundation funds a private pharmaceutical company that manufactures vaccines and is donating $50 million to 12 pharmaceutical companies to speed up development of a COVID-19 coronavirus vaccine.
In an internal memo former director of the WHO malaria program complained that Gates influence meant that the worlds leading malaria scientists were:
“Locked up in a cartel with their own research funding being linked to those of others within the group. The Gates Foundation was stifling debate on the best ways to treat and combat malaria prioritizing only those methods that relied on new technology or developing new drugs.”
– Dr. Arata Kochi, former director WHO malaria program, 2008
Fraud and Censorship in the COV-19 Pandemic
The worldwide lockdowns in response to the spread of the COVID-19 virus were based on an unverified, non-peer reviewed model of Imperial College researcher Neil Ferguson who also happened to be funded by the Gates Foundation. Largely because of that model’s projections, the world economy has been in lockdown for more than four months. Major problems with the model included different modeling runs using the same underlying assumption giving mortality results that differ by 80,000 deaths over a span of 80 days. Other problems include undocumented codes and numerous software bugs. The model’s projections of over 2 million people dying in the U.S. have far exceeded the actual number of 145,000. In addition, almost half of that number are due to infected patients being sent into nursing homes in New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and New Jersey. (“Failures of an Influential COVID-19 Model Used to Justify Lockdowns”) By looking at the mortality figures minus the nursing home deaths they are on the order of a severe flu season. It appears that a political agenda is at work to justify lockdowns and rights restrictions being employed across the U.S. In addition, outrageous manipulation of case numbers and mortality statistics have been reported:
- The CDC has explicitly directed doctors to list COVID-19 on death certificates even when no test was done as long as they’ve “assumed” the patient had it.
- According to Dr. Deborah Birx of the Coronavirus Task force “We’ve taken a very liberal approach to mortality…If someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting that as a COVID-19 death.”
- A local CBS affiliate examined 589 alleged Palm Beach, Florida fatalities and discovered that far less than a third (169) had actually died of the virus.
- In New York city 3,700 people were added in one day who did not test positive but were presumed to have died from the virus
- Motor cycle fatalities and gunshot victims have also been recorded as COVID-19 fatalities
Source for items above: (“Coronavirus Death Numbers Are A Complete Fraud”)
- In California as many as 300,000 infectious disease testing records were never logged into the public health system. The flawed data resulted in mortality rates appearing to be much higher than they would have been and was used as justification for the continued lockdown in California. (Director of California Department of Public Health abruptly quits after computer system “failure” results in coronavirus data “error”)
- The state of Colorado was forced to revise its death count down by 23 % from 1,150 to 878. The revision was made when county officials started accusing the state’s department of health of reclassifying deaths of those who tested positive for the virus but died of other factors such as alcohol poisoning. The state is now publishing numbers of deaths “with” COVID-19 separate from deaths “from” COVID-19. (“Horowitz: We have been lied to: 6 facts that change everything we know about SARS-CoV-2″)
- In Minnesota, state officials have admitted that every single person who dies in a nursing home after testing positive is now deemed to have died from the virus, never mind the fact that 25% of all natural deaths in a given week occur in nursing homes and that most cases of COVID-19 are asymptomatic, which means more often than not, they died exclusively of other causes. (“Horowitz: We have been lied to: 6 facts that change everything we know about SARS-CoV-2″)
- Scott Jensen, a Minnesota physician and Republican state senator received a 7-page document coaching him to fill out death certificates with a COVID-19 diagnosis without a lab test to confirm the patient actually had the virus. According to Dr. Jensen:
“Last Friday I received a 7-page document that told me if I had an 86-year-old patient that had pneumonia but was never tested for COVID-19 but some time after she came down with pneumonia we learned that she had been exposed to her son who had no symptoms but later on was identified with COVID-19, then it would be appropriate to diagnose on the death certificate COVID-19,”
Dr. Jensen’s discussion of the complaint can be viewed here. The video is 12 minutes long and demonstrates how public health authorities are manipulating and outright falsifying COVID-19 death certificates to make the outbreak appear worse than it actually is. (Source: “MN Senator and Dr. Reveals HHS Document Coached Him on How to Overcount COVID-19 Cases”)
- A July 2nd mandate from Texas Governor Greg Abbott mandated the use of face masks across the state on the basis of a massive increase in COVID-19 cases. At the Commissioners Court hearing for Collin County on May 18th, it was revealed that while previously the determination of a Covid “case” was a confirmed test result, the definition was suddenly changed to count “probable” cases as “cases.” As Judge Hill said at that May 18th meeting,
“If you have a subjective fever and you have a headache and you live in Collin County, you now meet the qualifications to be a probable COVID patient. It is remarkable how low the standard is now.” (“Is the Texas Covid “Spike” Fake News?”)
- On Monday July 27th America’s Frontline Doctors a group of board-certified medical doctors founded by Dr. Simone Gold held a Washington D.C. press conference on the steps of the Supreme Court to present their views on the COVID-19 lockdowns as well as the use of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19. However, after 17 million views of the press conference on Facebook and 80,000 views on YouTube, the video of the conference was removed from those platforms and Twitter for allegations that the video violated their “Community Guidelines.” (America’s Frontline Doctors. )
- In mid-July Florida supposedly experienced the largest increase in COVID-19 cases of any state on Sunday, July 12. What was not reported was that the so-called jump in cases was caused by a re-classification that grouped symptomatic and asymptomatic cases.
- In another irregularity involving Florida, the Orlando Health Department reported that 98 percent of the people it tested came up positive, when in reality it was actually 9.8 percent. The Orlando Veterans Medical Center had also “mistakenly” reported a 76 percent positivity rate, when the true figure was a mere six percent. And according to Chales Billi “We found numerous labs that are only reporting positive test results, so they show a 100 percent positivity rate,” (“Florida caught faking test results for coronavirus, 100% of people testing positive”)
- Hospitals are being reimbursed for treating any uninsured patients they diagnose with COVID-19. Medicare is also paying out more when the COVID-19 box is checked. So, in addition to directives that essentially guarantee death certificates identifying COVID-19 as a cause even though the patient would have died without it and may never have had it, there are also enormous financial incentives to inflate the case and mortality numbers. As Dr. Scott Jensen, told Laura Ingraham:
“If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator, you get $39,000; three times as much. Nobody can tell me, after 35 years in the world of medicine, that sometimes those kinds of things [don’t have an] impact on what we do.” (COVID’s MASSIVELY Inflated Fatality Count: Time For Trump To Appoint Commission For Truth And Accuracy)
Conclusions and Recommendations
At the beginning of this essay, I mentioned the worldwide effort by a number of groups with various ideologies working to de-stabilize the current world order that had one thing in common:
subjugating the rights and happiness of individuals to some other authority either secular or religious.
Prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic they concentrated their efforts on programs such as the Green New Deal to advance a program of greater centralized control over the American people. When the pandemic began in early 2020 those Progressive liberals in congress and around the country made no doubt of how they expected to exploit it
- “The coronavirus crisis is an opportunity to advance a more progressive agenda.” – Gavin Newsome, Governor of California
- “Coronavirus an Opportunity to Fundamentally Transform America”– Joe Biden, Democratic candidate for president
To the Democratic leadership it represents the possibility of extending further centralized control over the American people, and the primary reason why they have done everything possible to extend lockdowns and controls, and oppose any action supporting individual choice such as North Dakota’s and Sweden’s choice to not lockdown, the demonization of any sort of treatment such as hydroxychloroquine that would challenge the narrative that mandatory vaccination is the only way to end the pandemic, and the censorship of those speaking out about the scare tactics being used to justify lockdowns such as Dr. Simone Gold and America’s Frontline Doctors.
Their ability to do this has been possible because of the public funding of the medical/public health field that has entrenched a pharmaceutical approach to medicine and health that has become exceeding powerful and has grossly distorted the COVID-19 pandemic response. The FDA receives 45% of its annual budget from the pharmaceutical industry, the WHO receives approximately half its budget from private sources including Pharma and its allied foundations, and the CDC owns 56 vaccine patents and buys and distributes $4.6 billion in vaccines annually through the Vaccines for Children program, which is over 40% of its total budget. All of them are heavily invested financially and ideologically in the pro-vaccine narrative. (“Truth, Conspiracy, or SNAFU—You Decide.”)
So with Bill Gates essentially dictating the WHO’s priorities, [“Our priorities are your priorities”] the backing of the pharmaceutical industry, censorship of doctors and health professionals using Hydroxychloroquine and governments committing in advance to a COVID-19 vaccine, there is ample evidence that the pro-vaccine lobby has every intention of forcing a the COVID-19 vaccine down our throats whether we want it or not.
And Gates has said as much publicly:
“Until we get almost everybody vaccinated globally we still won’t be fully back to normal. You have to assume that’s going to be 18 months from now.”
Toward that end, the Department of Health and Human Services “Dept of HHS issued a declaration in March 13, 2020 (federal register, vol. 85, # 52) that retroactively provides to February 2, 2020
“liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against covid-19. “ This includes manufacturers, distributors, and program planners of any vaccine, used to treat, diagnose, cure, prevent, or mitigate covid-19. “
One day later the Gates Foundation dedicated an additional $100 million to fund treatment efforts to develop vaccines for the coronavirus response effort.
The Gates Foundation also controls the pro-vaccine narrative with its development of media partnerships with The Guardian, National Public Radio, the BBC, and the world health coverage of ABC news, and Big Tech companies such as Youtube and Facebook have already indicated they will not allow anything contrary to WHO policy recommendations:
“Anything that goes against [World Health Organization] recommendations would be a violation of our policy and so removal is another really important part of our policy” – Youtube CEO Susan Wojcicki
The pharmaceutical industry has also exerted its power over medical publications with the advertising dollars it spends on prestigious medical journals such as The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) . In June of 2020 , the Lancet was forced to withdraw a study that demonized hydoroxychoroquine as a treatment for COVID-19 because of falsified data ( “The Lancet Retracts Hydroxychloroquine Study”). Dr. Dousty-Blazy, the former French Health Minister Under Secretary General of UN and candidate for Director of WHO has publicly stated that The Lancet and the NEJM Editors admit to being pressured by pharmaceutical companies to publish certain results:
The Lancet’s boss … said … the pharmaceutical companies are so financially powerful today and are able to use such methodologies as to have us accept papers which … in reality manage to conclude what they want … I have been doing research for 20 years of my life. I never thought the boss of The Lancet could say that. And the boss of the NEJM too. He even said it was ‘criminal.’
(Source: “White Paper on Hydroxychloroquine” by Dr. Simone Gold, MD,” p. 13.)
The lockdowns, manufactured COVID-19 data concerning cases and mortality, and censorship of those opposing the pandemic narrative represents one of the biggest scams in history and has caused immense damage to the U.S. and the world at large. The principal actors in this nightmare are the public health authorities such as the CDC and WHO, pharmaceutical manufacturers, The Gates Foundation, the Progressive liberal leadership in Congress and the mainstream media. They are hellbent in keeping the American people locked down until they can force mandatory vaccination on us as a means of controlling us. The recommendations that follow are a step toward opposing such a policy and restoring our freedom.
Although President Trump has made serious errors in his actions concerning the pandemic, namely by listening to frauds such as Anthony Fauci, he is still the biggest obstacle in the way of the Progressive liberal machine and the socialists/globalists in the U.S. and beyond. One of the tactics they hope to use to drive Trump from office is the use of mail-in voting in the upcoming election.
Recommendation #1 – Stop the election fraud with mail-in voting
Major irregularities and fraud have been identified in primary elections using Mail-in balloting in Nevada, Virginia, and New Jersey. Organizations leading the fight to stop mail-in voting and cleanup voter rolls are ACT for America, Judicial Watch, and Project Veritas. All of them need financial support. Also, a petition to stop mail-in voting is also being circulated by ACT for America
Recommendation #2 – Help stop the censorship concerning Hydroxychloroquine
On Monday July 27th America’s Frontline Doctors a group of board-certified medical doctors founded by Dr. Simone Gold held a Washington D.C. press conference on the steps of the Supreme Court to present their views on the COVID-19 lockdowns as well as the use of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19. However, after 17 million views of the press conference on Facebook and 80,000 views on YouTube, the video of the conference was removed from those platforms and Twitter for allegations that the video violated their “Community Guidelines.” Although the video was censored on the social media platforms America’s Frontline Doctors now have a website where the video can be seen and other information available concerning the use of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19. Please spread the word about the video and consider supporting their efforts against the censorship of public health authorities.
Recommendation #3 – Help stop the TRACE Act (H.R. 6666)
Bill Gates has stated in interviews that , that the opening up from lockdowns should not be allowed until there is a digital immunity proof documenting who is vaccinated or not. The TRACE Act ( H.R. 6666) is the beginning of a major effort to enforce mandatory vaccinations, and if enacted means government officials may come to your home and demand that you take a COVID-19 test. And, according to some experts on the issue, if you test positive, that could mean that government will make sure you stay at home. Tom DeWeese and the American Policy Center are leading the fight against this intrusive legislation. Please see the American Policy Center website to read about this legislation and consider signing the petition requesting President Trump veto it (H.R. 6666)
Recommendation #4 – Find an independent news source
The mainstream media and the social media platforms of Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube are hopelessly corrupted and engaging in active censorship. The following independent sources are an alternative to consider: World Net Daily, The Epoch Times, Breitbart News, Brighteon.com , and Blaze TV.
Recommendation #5 – Help implement reforms concerning the public funding of public health
In “Official Vaccine Policy Flawed” Roger Schlafly identifies the nature of the problem of vaccine policy and recommends the reforms listed below. Those wishing to make long term reforms in the public health field should find these a good place to start by overhauling the current immunization policy and its secretive process that is currently being conducted by unaccountable parties. To develop a new, transparent process Schafly recommends:
1. Use an open process. All data, meetings, considerations, etc. should be open to the public, and rationales for all decisions should be documented.
2. Have a more representative membership. While vaccine researchers on the drug manufacturer payroll might be the most knowledgeable, most of the ACIP decisions concern public policy rather than biochemistry. For example, munitions experts develop plans for bombing Iraq, but they are not the ones who make the final decision of whether or not to bomb.
3. Publish the complete rationale for vaccine recommendations. There is no excuse for using proprietary and unreferred company data or confidential political directives to make public policy.
4. Separate science and medicine from policy analysis in the vaccine recommendations.
5. Make a scientific analysis of the risks and benefits of particular vaccines.
It is imperative that the American people become aware of the widespread fraud that has occurred concerning the COVID-19 narrative so that the lockdowns and other unnecessary infringements on our freedom can finally end and the process of overhauling our badly corrupted public health system can begin.
Very best regards,
Mike Gemmell, Founder and President, Restore Our American Republic, LLC